George Francis FitzGerald 1893
In 1893, George Francis FitzGerald noted that the upper layers of the atmosphere must be fairly good conductors. Assuming that the height of these layers are about 100km above ground, he estimated that oscillations (in this case the lowest mode of the Schumann resonances) would have a period of 0.1 second. Because of this contribution, it has been suggested to rename these resonances as Schumann–FitzGerald resonances. However FitzGerald’s findings were not widely known as they were only presented at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, followed by a brief mention in a column in Nature.
Nikola Tesla 1899
The first documented observations of global electromagnetic resonance were made by Nikola Tesla at his Colorado Springs laboratory in 1899. This observation led to certain conclusions about the electrical properties of the Earth, and which made the basis for his idea for wireless energy transmission.
Tesla researched ways to transmit power and energy wirelessly over long distances (via transverse waves and longitudinal waves). He transmitted extremely low frequencies through the ground as well as between the Earth’s surface and the Kennelly-Heaviside layer. He received patents on wireless transceivers that developed standing waves by this method. Making mathematical calculations based on his experiments, Tesla discovered that the resonant frequency of the Earth was approximately 8 hertz (Hz). In the 1950s, researchers confirmed that the resonant frequency of the Earth’s ionospheric cavity was in this range (later named the Schumann resonance).
Heaviside and Kennelly 1902
Hence the first suggestion that an ionosphere existed, capable of trapping electromagnetic waves, is attributed to Heaviside and Kennelly (1902). It took another twenty years before Edward Appleton and Barnett in 1925, were able to prove experimentally the existence of the ionosphere.
Winfried Otto Schumann 1952
Although some of the most important mathematical tools for dealing with spherical waveguides were developed by G. N. Watson in 1918, it was Winfried Otto Schumann who first studied the theoretical aspects of the global resonances of the earth–ionosphere waveguide system, known today as the Schumann resonances. In 1952–1954 Schumann, together with H. L. König, attempted to measure the resonant frequencies.
However, it was not until measurements made by Balser and Wagner in 1960–1963 that adequate analysis techniques were available to extract the resonance information from the background noise. Since then there has been an increasing interest in Schumann resonances in a wide variety of fields.
The average annual wind speed on Earth is approximately 56 kilometers per hour, on other planets like Neptun it is 1138 kilometers per hour.
It is commonly believed that weather is driven on Earth primarily by the Sun’s thermal influence on the atmosphere. When any particular region heats up, the air expands and loses density, creating a relative low pressure area. Cooler air, being denser, will naturally flow into the bottom of the warm, low pressure region, causing an upwardly rotating convection cell to form.
Most weather systems on Earth are thought to be based on that simple kinetic explanation: winds blow when the cooler, denser air flows into the warmer, buoyant air.
The kinetic model of weather does not take into account the fact that planets much farther out in the Solar System have sustained winds that make those on our planet seem like gentle breezes. The average wind speeds on the gas giant planets are fantastic, despite their atmosphere are not affected from the sun’s thermal energy as the earth, having cold atmospheres like Neptun, that measures minus 220 degrees Celsius!
The phenomenon of the electric wind
The phenomenon of the electric wind was first observed in the Electrostatic Experiments in the years 1600 long before the nature of electricity was understood and among a lot of new and impressive phenomena (Attraction, Repulsion, Sparks, Luminescence…). Four century later, the Electric Wind remains a sort of laboratory curiosity, which has lost a great part of its mystery but for complex reasons is still unexplored.
The Electric Wind is in fact a movement of the neutral fluid induced in the bulk of the fluid by electrical forces. To obtain such an effect it is necessary to obtain at least one area were there is a dissymmetry between positive and negative forces i.e. a region outside from electric neutrality. This is not the case in hot plasmas or even in the cold plasma of a glow discharge.
The electric wind phenomenon is worth further studies, because it is still today a nearly virgin territory. Why is such interesting stuff not presented in school? If you are a teacher and you love teaching, take the time to show your students how interesting the universe is. To perform a experiment that demonstrates that most of the wind on earth is not produced by the solar heat, but of the electric forces, will for sure catapult an entire generation into a new paradigm. If you are a science “nerd” (you are not alone) why do you not make a video and post it on Youtube?
Consider also that mechanical effects are created when electric forces are applied to fluids. Did you know that you’re body is like a battery? (If you have seen the Matrix Trilogy you know already!)
If you are a biologist or a doctor, perhaps you has wondered how it is possible that the minerals are hold in a harmonic dispersion in the whole body. Well then consider the fact, that our body is a electric machine, that disperse the fluid throughout the body also with the help of electric forces. For example our bones generates Piezoelectricity.
So why are you still reading my posts? Go and make some experiments and upload your results on the web!
From ESOcast, explore the state-of-the-art technology behind the Very Large telescope, which has provided astronomers with an unequalled view of the Universe. To obtain the sharpest images of the sky, the VLT has to cope with two major effects that distort the images of celestial objects. The first one is mirror deformations due to their large sizes. This problem is corrected using a computer-controlled support system — active optics — that ensures that the mirrors keep their desired shapes under all circumstances. The second effect is produced by Earth’s atmosphere, which makes stars appear blurry, even with the largest telescopes. Adaptive optics is a real-time correction of the distortions produced by the atmosphere using computer-controlled mirrors that deform hundreds of times per second to counteract the atmospheric effects.
As one demonstration of its power the VLT’s sensitive infrared cameras, helped by adaptive optics, have been able to peer through the massive dust clouds that block our view to Milky Way’s core. The images, taken over many years, have allowed astronomers to actually watch stars orbiting around the monstrous black hole that lies in the center of our galaxy. It was even possible to detect energetic flares from gas clouds falling into the black hole.
We are living in a material world and science is made by material … girls?
Well, one thing is for sure, science is just a method for searching the truth and nothing more. It’s a technique, not a religion. But some people create their own private religion out of everything. This is a shame!
I promised myself to be not too aggressive regarding this hot topic “radiocarbon dating“, because many scientists and scientific educated assistants are well-intentioned and they do not misuse science for propagating lies about history. But this “well-intentioned” men and womens are trained in institutions, universities or schools which promote a materialistic point of view. They absorb this spirit of materialism (they breath the contaminated air), even if this would not affect directly their faith, but it forms their scientific worldview and it became a very restricted materialistic worldview that is contradictory to the Truth in many aspects.
So this good people are now living with a split worldview, a dualistic one, not a holistic and harmonious one which is conform to the Bible account of the creation and the catastrophic event like the global flood at the time of Noah. Could this materialistic worldview embedded in a spiritual hungry human create a cause to stumble? I don’t think so, because real faith is not based on single scientific theories. But it provides a non uniform worldview, separating religion from science. Let’s now see if we cannot bring them together, at least for this “radiocarbon dating” topic.
How does Radiocarbon Dating work? Cosmic rays enter the earth’s atmosphere in large numbers every day. For example, every person is hit by about half a million cosmic rays every hour. It is not uncommon for a cosmic ray to collide with an atom in the atmosphere, creating a secondary cosmic ray in the form of an energetic neutron, and for these energetic neutrons to collide with nitrogen atoms. When the neutron collides, a nitrogen-14 (seven protons, seven neutrons) atom turns into a carbon-14 atom (six protons, eight neutrons) and a hydrogen atom (one proton, zero neutrons). Carbon-14 is radioactive, with a half-life of about 5,700 years.
(Source: howstuffworks.com – How Carbon-14 Dating Works)
As soon as a living organism dies, it stops taking in new carbon. The ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 at the moment of death is the same as every other living thing, but the carbon-14 decays and is not replaced. The carbon-14 decays with its half-life of 5,700 years, while the amount of carbon-12 remains constant in the sample. By looking at the ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 in the sample and comparing it to the ratio in a living organism, it is possible to determine the age of a formerly living thing fairly precisely.
(Source: howstuffworks.com – How Carbon-14 Dating Works)
The Calibration Problem
The ratio of C-14 to C-12 in the atmosphere is not constant, therefore calibration is necessary. It have shown that the ratio of C-14 to C-12 has varied significantly during the history of the Earth. In order to “calibrate” the measurement in a accurate way we need to know the atmospheric conditions during the different epochs of the earth. Catastrophic events, meteors, sun cycles and sun radiation anomalies, volcanic eruptions would change the conditions drastically. Our atmosphere and our solar system are not static. And geology findings proves that in the past catastrophic events occurred, and despite this facts the radiocarbon dating is still considered a accurate dating method.
No matter how “useful” it is though, the radiocarbon method is still not capable of yielding accurate and reliable results. There are gross discrepancies, the chronology is uneven and relative, and the accepted dates are actually selected dates. This whole blessed thing is nothing but 13th century alchemy, and it all depends upon which funny paper you read.
Robert E. Lee, Radiocarbon: Ages in Error. Anthropological Journal of Canada, vol. 19 (3), 1981, pp. 9-29
What does the Bible say about our Atmosphere?
The creation account in Genesis says that God divided the water on the earth into two sections, one above the atmosphere (the expansion) and one below on the surface of the earth. So the water above the expansion (or over the thermosphere) acted like a shield against radiation from the sun and outer space (water vapour canopy). This “atmospheric condition“, let’s call it the preflood atmospheric condition, got a low radiation and the production of C-14 was very low.
Every attempt to use radiocarbon dating for artifacts deriving from the preflood world without the right calibration will result in a exaggerated dating. Instead of a few thousand years it will result in thousand of thousand years. Calibrating the radiocarbon dating setup without this knowledge leads simply to false conclusions.
The water vapour canopy was one source of the rain during the Great Flood. The event that triggered the massive geothermal upheaval during Noah’s life also made the water vapour canopy unstable. (See Genesis chapters 6 to 8 for the reason for the Flood and details of this event that reshaped the earth’s crust.) Over a period of forty days the water vapour layer was totally destroyed. This would have allowed production of C-14 to immediately increase enormously.
Note: This informations provided here are not a evidence for a “young earth“, because the Bible does not claim that God created earth in six days of 1000 years each. The earth was prepared during six time periods for enabling life, but like Genesis 1:1 states the heaven and the earth was already created before the “six days” periods began.
Materialism against the Truth
Materialists have a good reason for propagating false theories like the Ice Age hypothesis instead telling the truth about the global great flood which indeed occurred and for which evidence is so overwhelming. This system would never run smoothly if people would finally wake up and realize how illusionary it is. Every layer of this system is a lie, build up on another lie, and so on. All this layers forms together a huge complex system which enables egoistic people to act free without boundaries. Some of this people are on the top of the pyramid and they KNOW how this system works and how the group mind of simple people works. They know that every field needs to be censored and protected by dogmatic teachings, from science to art to religion. For all this different fields the wrong teachings represents the restrictive boundaries against a new free world. Inside this boundaries other laws are applied not based on eternal principles, and inside this boundaries eternity seems not to exist. Indeed they fear the truth because it represents a threat to their world based on lies. So you can imagine how science works today in this materialistic world? Do you think that they would ever admit a theory based on truth if this represents a threat to all the layers of this old world?
The mainstream science community spends billions for researching a method for building a quantum computer and yet it already exist in every cell of our body: Our DNA is a quantum computer, as Stuart Hameroff proved.
And the DNA is not only a computer, it’s also able to receive and send on a specific bandwidth. DNA is a antenna!
Some parts of the code in the DNA is blocked and cannot be read. But under certain electromagnetic influences this parts gets unlocked and they can be read and then something change in the organism. In nature all organism communicates on different ways. One of the most astonishing ways is the electromagnetic broadcasting network which exist before humans even knows about the existence of radio signals. This invisible world of communication is similar to the biophotonic communication of plants and microorganism.
Today we have fractal antennas in our mobile phones. The fractal design of antennas enables to build them very small and they become even more powerful. DNA is a fractal construct too and it’s ability as an antenna exceed even that of the man made fractal antennas. Antennas in mobile phones are controlled electronically by enabling and disabling certain parts of the fractal design, permitting to switch channel and frequency. The microscopic design of the DNA is even more powerful. It’s able to do that on a quantum mechanical way. So try to overtop this!
I would really like to know what they talk about all the time. I mean bacterias sends signals around 1 kilohertz, what do they communicate on this bandwidth? “Hey John, how are you?” … “Jo man, I fine. How are your kids?” … “Thanks, they playing around, replicating themselves, you know, the usual.” According to research presented by Northeastern University physicist Allan Widom, based on existing knowledge of DNA and electrons, bacteria can indeed communicate. But I would love to know what they say.
Neurobiologists find that weak electrical fields in the brain help neurons fire together.
Pasadena, Calif.—The brain—awake and sleeping—is awash in electrical activity, and not just from the individual pings of single neurons communicating with each other. In fact, the brain is enveloped in countless overlapping electric fields, generated by the neural circuits of scores of communicating neurons. The fields were once thought to be an “epiphenomenon” similar to the sound the heart makes—which is useful to the cardiologist diagnosing a faulty heart beat, but doesn’t serve any purpose to the body, says Christof Koch, the Lois and Victor Troendle Professor of Cognitive and Behavioral Biology and professor of computation and neural systems at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech).
Our heart generates a electromagnetic signal which can be received by other humans over a certain distance. In a certain way what we know as “intuition” may have a scientific explainable background. Do you know the feeling of “atmosphere” entering a room full of people? And do you know the strange feeling in the moment when this “atmosphere” change? Sometimes it change without apparent reason, no visible or audible trigger. But through the electromagnetic signals which a heart of a human emits a whole group can be affected. This is the case when negative or positive thoughts and feelings overflow, resulting in specific electromagnetic signals literally from the heart.
Do you know acupuncture? Did you know that our body has the ability to store electrostatic energy? Some of this energy is a kind of memory in our body. Not only our brain stores information, it’s the whole body which acts as a dynamic database. The acupuncture therapists explains that lifeforce or “qi” flows through specific pathways (meridians) in our body. Some of this pathways forms crosspoints on the surface and can be manipulated by needles. This is what is done in acupuncture, some energy is released, some is diverted and sometimes heat is applied on this acupuncture points. Acupuncture points can also be stimulated with light (laser) or electricity.
Some therapists claims that they are able to perceive a “aura“, a kind of field around the human body. This field has some quality which can be described with form and color. So the question is: Does our body act as antenna as a whole?
The Venus suntrap can snap shut with the tactile arrival of its insect prey. But how far has this communicative process gone? George Washington Crile believed that not only do plants communicate between themselves by means of electromagnetic signals, and that this can be demonstrated experimentally, but that they are also sensitive to non-plant life should it approach them. He further claimed in his 1926 book The bipolar theory of living processes and in another ten years later entitled The phenomena of life: a radio-electrical interpretation that plants, once programmed by experience, were sentient about even the subtle intentions of the approaching fauna. This stretches the imagination and belief of any self-respecting [mainstream] scientist (Crile, 1926).
Our little blue planet does not only deliver us with life enabling environment, but also with powerful electromagnetic generator which vibrates at a rate of 7 Hz. Schumann resonances are global electromagnetic resonances, excited by lightning discharges in the cavity formed by the Earth’s surface and the ionosphere. This frequency of 7 Hz seems to be a fundamental EM stimulant for all life forms, like Montagnier demonstrated with his experiments with DNA and water memory. It enables communication on the electromagnetic level.
The biosphere is the global sum of all ecosystems. It can also be called the zone of life on Earth, a closed (apart from solar and cosmic radiation) and self-regulating system. From the broadest biophysiological point of view, the biosphere is the global ecological system integrating all living beings and their relationships, including their interaction with the elements of the lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere.
In a broader sense; biospheres are any closed, self-regulating systems containing ecosystems; including artificial ones such as Biosphere 2 and BIOS-3; and, potentially, ones on other planets or moons.
Origin and use of the term
The term “biosphere” was coined by geologist Eduard Suess in 1875, which he defined as:
The place on Earth’s surface where life dwells.
While this concept has a geological origin, it is an indication of the impact of both Darwin and Maury, Nicholas Morken on the earth sciences. The biosphere’s ecological context comes from the 1920s, preceding the 1935 introduction of the term “ecosystem” by Sir Arthur Tansley. Vernadsky defined ecology as the science of the biosphere. It is an interdisciplinary concept for integrating astronomy, geophysics, meteorology, biogeography, geology, geochemistry, hydrology and, generally speaking, all life and earth sciences.
In the early 1970s, Lynn Margulis, a microbiologist from the United States, added to the hypothesis, specifically noting the ties between the biosphere and other Earth systems. For example, when carbon dioxide levels increase in the atmosphere, plants grow more quickly. As their growth continues, they remove more and more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Many scientists are now involved in new fields of study that examine interactions between biotic and abiotic factors in the biosphere, such as geobiology and geomicrobiology.
Ecosystems occur when communities and their physical environment work together as a system. The difference between this and a biosphere is simple, the biosphere is everything in general terms.
Extent of Earth’s biosphere Every part of the planet, from the polar ice caps to the Equator, supports life of some kind. Recent advances in microbiology have demonstrated that microbes live deep beneath the Earth’s terrestrial surface, and that the total mass of microbial life in so-called “uninhabitable zones” may, in biomass, exceed all animal and plant life on the surface. The actual thickness of the biosphere on earth is difficult to measure. Birds typically fly at altitudes of 650 to 1,800 metres, and fish that live deep underwater can be found down to -8,372 metres in the Puerto Rico Trench.
There are more extreme examples for life on the planet: Rüppell’s vulture has been found at altitudes of 11,300 metres; bar-headed geese migrate at altitudes of at least 8,300 metres; yaks live at elevations between 3,200 to 5,400 metres above sea level; mountain goats live up to 3,050 metres. Herbivorous animals at these elevations depend on lichens, grasses, and herbs.
Microscopic organisms live at such extremes that, taking them into consideration puts the thickness of the biosphere much greater. Culturable microbes have been found in the Earth’s upper atmosphere as high as 41 km (25 mi) (Wainwright et al., 2003, in FEMS Microbiology Letters). It is unlikely, however, that microbes are active at such altitudes, where temperatures and air pressure are extremely low and ultraviolet radiation very high. More likely these microbes were brought into the upper atmosphere by winds or possibly volcanic eruptions. Barophilic marine microbes have been found at more than 10 km (6 mi) depth in the Marianas Trench (Takamia et al., 1997, in FEMS Microbiology Letters). Microbes are not limited to the air, water or the Earth’s surface. Culturable thermophilic microbes have been extracted from cores drilled more than 5 km (3 mi) into the Earth’s crust in Sweden (Gold, 1992, and Szewzyk, 1994, both in PNAS), from rocks between 65-75 °C. Temperature increases with increasing depth into the Earth’s crust. The speed at which the temperature increases depends on many factors, including type of crust (continental vs. oceanic), rock type, geographic location, etc. The upper known limit of temperature at which microbial life can exist is 122 °C (Methanopyrus kandleri Strain 116), and it is likely that the limit of life in the “deep biosphere” is defined by temperature rather than absolute depth.
Our biosphere is divided into a number of biomes, inhabited by broadly similar flora and fauna. On land, biomes are separated primarily by latitude. Terrestrial biomes lying within the Arctic and Antarctic Circles are relatively barren of plant and animal life, while most of the more populous biomes lie near the equator. Terrestrial organisms in temperate and Arctic biomes have relatively small amounts of total biomass, smaller energy budgets, and display prominent adaptations to cold, including world-spanning migrations, social adaptations, homeothermy, estivation and multiple layers of insulation.
Only Life can support Life
The earth is alive and it is able to support life. Every life-form supports the life of the others and the evidence of the interdependency becomes more clear than more we study the single aspects of the nature. Can we therefore conclude that the earth as a whole has a kind of consciousness too? Maybe the earth is not self-reflective or self-aware, just like animals are not self-aware. But maybe the earth is able to react on threat in order to protect the life of the many.
Physical Evidence for Consciousness on Global Scale
Physically the requirements for consciousness are stable electromagnetic fields which are created by our brains, modulated, alternated, and so on. Now if we observe the earth, yes even the whole solar system, it is a organism able not only to create electromagnetic fields, but also to maintain them stable for longer time. If our single brains creating their own smaller electromagnetic fields could interact with the greater fields of the earth or even the solar system, then there would be a kind of communication between all life-forms. Indeed science delivers us with plenty of evidence for such a interaction. For example the Global Consciousness Project from the Princeton University demonstrates that events like 911 was able to “shake the collective consciousness” and trigger anomalities in the results of random number generators. The consciousness of many is focused and they become coherently in some way. I wonder if in near future another event could cause the formation of a stable field for a collective consciousness, which could be aware enough. preventing criminal acts and exposing evil secrets.
The Gaia hypothesis, also known as Gaia theory or Gaia principle, proposes that all organisms and their inorganic surroundings on Earth are closely integrated to form a single and self-regulating complex system, maintaining the conditions for life on the planet.
The scientific investigation of the Gaia hypothesis focuses on observing how the biosphere and the different life forms contributes to the stability of global temperature, ocean salinity, oxygen in the atmosphere and other factors of habitability in a optimal homeostasis. The Gaia hypothesis was formulated by the chemist James Lovelock and co-developed by the microbiologist Lynn Margulis in the 1970s. Initially received with hostility by the scientific community, it is now studied in the disciplines of geophysiology and Earth system science, and some of its principles have been adopted in fields like biogeochemistry and systems ecology. This ecological hypothesis has also inspired analogies and various interpretations in social sciences, politics, and religion under a vague philosophy and movement.
It’s very cold and I need to go outside into my car … but now I see that the protective glass of my car is frozen. The exhaled water vapor from yesterday forms now “frost patterns“. I have seen a lot of this patterns. But now I wonder why it forms so strange patterns. They look like the vasculature of our bronchial and lungs system. Beautiful.
But why, … I wonder all the times about “patterns” and their source, why has the water vapor frozen to such a strange pattern? The patterns in the picture above are not like the patterns I have on my protective glass of my car. Indeed I have never seen such patterns like this.
Maybe because yesterday a passenger I drove to the city was ill. The passenger got bronchitis, a inflammation of the mucous membranes of the bronchi. The water vapor derived in part also from his lungs. His system was in a critical state, his life-force was fighting in order to reestablish order in his body. The water is able to memorize such information, especially the form.
And right now I wonder if there is outside there in this world anyone else who has the same thoughts like me. Or similar thoughts, similar in form and shape. Maybe this person is breathing the same air like me … no, I’m convinced that he or she is breathing the same air and not only that. All humans breath the same air, because we have only this one atmosphere. Is the water vapor exhaled from other people affecting our thoughts? Or do my thoughts affecting others people thought, just by exhaling the water vapor that was once in my own body, in my brain, my lungs?
Dude, this change everything. If this is true, then responsibility is the consequence. And I understand why so many people just don’t want to accept such an insight. What would change if our awareness for our collective memory, stored in part in our oceans, in this liquid consciousness covering 70% of our planet, composed by the elements hydrogen and oxygen, … what would happen if this awareness would reach a critical level?
Some people thinks that secrets are not a natural thing.
But many people still believes that you can hide secrets from everyone else.
BUT what would happen if one day the rules of this game change? And suddenly there will be no place to hide your secrets, because this awareness for our collective memory has reached the critical level, such high that everyone is able to see your thoughts. Maybe not literally seeing your thoughts, but everyone else would be aware of your thoughts to a certain level in order that you could not hide them anymore for so long time. Crimes would not be possible anymore. A criminal could not plan a robbery because people would “know” it in advance. And when this criminal individual arrives to his destiny, a bank or a shop, the police would already wait for him there.