hydrogen2oxygen

One plus one equals two.

This is true even before humans existence. But many scientists and mathematicans spreads the beliefe that mathematic is an human invention to describe the reality.

“Mathematicians themselves often insist that their work has no practical effect. The British mathematician G. H. Hardy went so far as to describe his own work this way: “No discovery of mine has made, or is likely to make, directly or indirectly, for good or ill, the least difference to the amenity of the world.” He was wrong. The Hardy-Weinberg law allows population geneticists to predict how genes are transmitted from one generation to the next, and Hardy’s work on the theory of numbers found unexpected implications in the development of codes.”

“Nobel Laureate Eugene Wigner once wondered about “the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” in the formulation of the laws of nature.”

“Is God a Mathematician? investigates why mathematics is as powerful as it is. From ancient times to the present, scientists and philosophers have marveled at how such a seemingly abstract discipline could so perfectly explain the natural world. More than that — mathematics has often made predictions, for example, about subatomic particles or cosmic phenomena that were unknown at the time, but later were proven to be true.
Is mathematics ultimately invented or discovered?
If, as Einstein insisted, mathematics is “a product of human thought that is independent of experience,” how can it so accurately describe and even predict the world around us?”

Source: Is God a Mathematician?, written by Mario Livio (978-0743294058)

Is mathematic a language?

Well, yes, sure, why not!?!

If we observe the patterns in human language, in music, in the singing of birds and wales, …
all these patterns are based on mathematical principles.

“Though the structures and patterns of mathematics reflect the structure of, and resonate in, the human mind every bit as much as do the structures and patterns of music, human beings have developed no mathematical equivalent of a pair of ears. Mathematics can be seen only with the eyes of the mind.” All of his books are attempts to get around this problem, to “try to communicate to others some sense of what it is we experience–some sense of the simplicity, the precision, the purity, and the elegance that give the patterns of mathematics their aesthetic value.”

Source: The Language of Mathematics, written by Keith Devlin (978-0805072549)

Dear friend max();

We’ve all ready talked about reductionism in the field of science and it’s consequences to the acquisition of deeper insight of physical and spiritual reality.

Well this can be applied to the desperate search for a meaning in life too.

People are inclined to observe the small thinks as isolated from the context. They try to become rich as possible, making a big career or make themselves a big name.

The problem in searching meaning of life and the research in science has similar roots. Reducing the problem or the subject to it’s smallest part it loose it’s meaning. There is no sense in accumulating money if you cannot use it for the well of other people and there is no sense in observing a atom without considering the surrounding complexity.

Let me make a example:
A language is used to transport meaning from one consciousness to an other. The meaning is coded in information and the smallest information unit is a bit (0/1).

Translated in XML it would look like this:

<truth>
<meaning>
<context>
<information>
<bit>1</bit>
<bit>0</bit>
<bit>0</bit>
<bit>1</bit>
<bit>0</bit>
<bit>1</bit>
<bit>1</bit>
<bit>1</bit>
</information>
</context>
</meaning>
</truth>

If we take the single 1 without the other parts and the bigger context, the meaning is not manifest.
And without the meaning the truth is not recognized!

With other words, we need to take some time to zoom out for seeing the hole and not only the particle.

“So astounding are the facts in this connection, that it would seem as though the Creator himself had electrically designed this planet …”
Nikola Tesla

Here some background to the video series on Youtube how a Joe Cell works.
First at all, this theory is not new and it’s not my contribution, but the result of a brainstorming of a small community of alternative science research group in the free energy field.

A paradigm shift occurs!

And it occurs without the agreement of mainstream science! Because it doesn’t matter anymore if mainstream agrees or not!
In a world where the concept of “Open Source Free Energy Tech” exist, there is no need of magazines like “Nature” that tells us what to believe or not.

The evolving of human language and consciousness creates a gateway to a deeper understanding of nature.

Many scientists already achieved through their open-mindedness a new revolutionary view of our reality.

I will mention some of them:

John Carew Eccles:
“I maintain that the human mystery is incredibly demeaned by scientific reductionism, with its claim in promissory materialism to account eventually for all of the spiritual world in terms of patterns of neuronal activity. This belief must be classed as a superstition. . . . we have to recognize that we are spiritual beings with souls existing in a spiritual world as well as material beings with bodies and brains existing in a material world.“
–Source: Evolution of the Brain, Creation of the Self, p. 241

According to Eccles, we have a nonmaterial mind or self which acts upon, and is influenced by, our material brains; there is a mental world in addition to the physical world, and the two interact. However, Eccles denies that the mind is a type of nonphysical substance (as it is in Cartesian dualism), and says that it merely belongs to a different world. (How the Self Controls Its Brain, p. 38.) But unless our mind (and the world in which it exists) is pure nothingness — in which case it would not exist — it must be composed of finer grades of energy-substance. Indeed, our inner constitution may comprise several nonphysical levels.

Rupert Sheldrake:
Biologist Rupert Sheldrake for instance, proposes that our physical bodies are organized by morphogenetic fields, our habits by behavioral morphic fields, and our thoughts and ideas by mental morphic fields. He suggests that our conscious self may be a higher level of our being which interacts with the lower fields and, through them with the physical brain and body. Theosophy adds to this list spiritual and divine levels, and describes all the different “layers” of our constitution as different phases of consciousness-substance.
–Source: http://www.theosophy-nw.org/theosnw/science/prat-bra.htm

Charles Seife:
Seife presents a compelling case that information is the one constant that ties all of science, indeed all of the universe, together.
…
Seife demonstrates how quantum oddities so alien to classical physics actually are consistent with the same physical laws that govern the world we see. For example, the fact that entangled particles half a universe away can instantaneously communicate with one another (what Einstein called “spooky action” at a distance), apparently violating the law that nothing can exceed the speed of light, can be understood through information theory. Seife takes all of this to a most bizarre, but logical, conclusion reached by many cosmologists: the universe as we know it is but one of an infinite number of universes, all brought into being through information transfer.
– Source: Amazon.com

Peter Plichta:
According to Peter Plichta numbers have a real existence.

Holding doctorates in chemistry, physics and biology, Peter Plichta applies his multifaceted scientific knowledge to the search for a universal building plan and makes a profound discovery. Plichta shows how a mathematical formula based on prime numbers underlies the mystery of the world. By decoding this fundamental numerical code, Plichta answers questions that have baffled mankind for ages and proves that the universe did not arise out of chance.
– Source: God’s Secret Formula: The Deciphering of the Riddle of the Universe and the Prime Number Code

Conclusion:
God created this universe using his language. Everything points on this evidence.
It is not deniable, because laws of linguistic are applicable to physic, chemistry and biology.
Mathematic is already recognized as a universal language.

“Da die Raumenergie zahlreichen Dogmen der etablierten Wissenschaft, etwa der Unantastbarkeit der Einstein’schen Relativitätstheorie, widerspricht (wenn man von Lambda, Einsteins kosmologischer Konstanten, absieht), wehrt sich die Schulwissenschaft vehement gegen die neuen Denkansätze, in der Raumenergie ihren Platz hat. Ihre Einführung als Energiequelle wird nicht ohne eine wissenschaftliche Revolution vonstatten gehen. Dieser Paradigmenwechsel ist durch das rasante Aufkommen von Publikationen, die leider meist unter Esoterik gehandelt werden, die tatsächlich aber wahre wissenschaftliche Werke sind, bereits klar ersichtlich. Es ist auch kein Zufall, dass die Zeit der Raumenergie auch die Zeit des Internets ist. Die Revolution der Kommunikation ermöglicht es den Raumenergieforschern, denen die klassischen Kanäle des wissenschaftlichen Austauschs verwehrt sind, sich endlich effektiv auszutauschen. Diese Netzwerkbildung wird der Raumenergie letztendlich zum Durchbruch verhelfen.”

Quelle: www.rafoeg.de

“When Moshe Daniel first heard about the Joe Cell technology, he immediately began thinking of a spherical design. Knowing a little about the Joe Cell, it just seemed to make much more sense that a spherical design would be more energy efficient, and even smaller. Moshe named the spherical cell the Moe-Joe cell in honour of the basis of the technology coming from Joe and also after his first name - Moshe aka Moe. So a Moe-Joe cell is essentially a Spherical Joe Cell. That’s it. That’s all. All the same technology, theory, and practical application, but with a better, more efficient, smaller, and less expensive design that is easier to assemble. “

Quelle: www.moe-joe-working.com